[CANCELLED] CeSCuP seminar – Justifying Atrocities: Moral Disengagement, Ingroup Glorification and Essentialism in Post- War Sri Lanka (Tuesday 18th of February)

Justifying Atrocities: Moral Disengagement, Ingroup Glorification and Essentialism in Post- War Sri Lanka  Kulani Abendroth-Dias (PhD, Institute for European Studies, Belgium) & Johanna Ray Vollhardt (PhD, Clark University, Massachusetts) Abstract. The psychosocial mechanisms by which individuals cognitively restructure and disengage themselves from moral transgressions is vital to the study of

Start

18 February 2020 - 12 h 30 min

End

18 February 2020 - 14 h 00 min

Address

30 Avenue Antoine Depage - 1050 Brussels (Room DC8.322 - 8th floor, Building D, Campus Solbosch of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences - Université Libre de Bruxelles)   View map

Categories

Departement Seminar

Justifying Atrocities: Moral Disengagement, Ingroup Glorification and Essentialism in Post- War Sri Lanka 

Kulani Abendroth-Dias (PhD, Institute for European Studies, Belgium) & Johanna Ray Vollhardt (PhD, Clark University, Massachusetts)

Abstract. The psychosocial mechanisms by which individuals cognitively restructure and disengage themselves from moral transgressions is vital to the study of violent intergroup relations. Yet, very little research so far has examined these mechanisms in conflict regions that were more directly affected by violence. Building on the work by Bandura (1996, 1999) on moral disengagement which originally did not include the use of competitive victimhood, this study aimed to explore the prevalence of mechanisms of moral disengagement among a sample of 75 Sinhalese and Tamil citizens in post-war Sri Lanka, and to compare the occurrence and use of different moral disengagement strategies among the majority group (Sinhalese) and the low power minority group (Tamils). The study also aimed to test and expand on the prevalence of Bandura’s original strategies of moral disengagement. Participants were presented with scenarios in which the group membership of victim and perpetrator groups was manipulated, resulting in a 2×2 design with one experimental factor (target group membership) and one quasi-experimental factor (participant’s group membership). Participants were interviewed about each scenario and responses were content-coded. In addition to the categories of moral disengagement proposed by Bandura (euphemistic labeling, advantageous comparison, diffusion or displacement of responsibility, victim blaming, distortion of consequences), we found other strategies of moral disengagement such as competitive victimhood, essentialist attributions, threat, and denial. Differences in the use of these categories between group members in terms of religion, military affiliation and personal victimization are discussed, with an emphasis on the use of competitive victimhood.

MORE DETAIL

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Research

Atero voluptatum ptatum eos et accusamus et iusto

Commitment

Ptatum eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus

Innovation

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem

CONTACT

Université Libre de Bruxelles
50 Avenue Franklin Roosevelt CP122
B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
Secrétaire: Luce Vercammen
Phone: +32 (2) 650 4643 Fax: +32 (2) 650 4045