Virtual CeSCuP seminar (Microsoft Teams) - How do dispositions-prejudice associations differ around the globe? (Tuesday 21st of April)

How do dispositions-prejudice associations differ around the globe? Jasper van Assche (PhD, Ghent University)   Abstract: Ample research in social, personality, and political psychology has examined the dispositions that lie at the basis of individual differences in prejudice. Such studies revealed strong, positive, and robust associations of right-wing attitudes and

Start

21 April 2020 - 12 h 30 min

End

21 April 2020 - 14 h 00 min

Address

  View map

Categories

Departement Seminar

How do dispositions-prejudice associations differ around the globe?

Jasper van Assche (PhD, Ghent University)

 

Abstract: Ample research in social, personality, and political psychology has examined the dispositions that lie at the basis of individual differences in prejudice. Such studies revealed strong, positive, and robust associations of right-wing attitudes and religiosity with various kinds of prejudice (e.g., racism, sexism, ageism, and homophobia). I highlight that the strength of these relationships is not the same everywhere across the globe, and it deems worthwhile and even necessary to employ a person x context multilevel framework that examines contextual-level variables curbing the individual-level dispositions-prejudice associations. Following a threat-constraint model, my analyses consistently reveal that contexts characterized by high threat attenuate – or constrain – the relationship between individual differences and several types of negative outgroup attitudes. In particular, a first set of studies presents cross-level interaction effects showing a strong relation between right-wing attitudes and prejudice in regions with a low right-wing ideological climate, whereas this relationship is weaker and often even absent in regions  with a high right-wing climate. A second set of studies offers similar findings regarding religiosity and prejudice. Specifically, strong associations between being religious and being bigoted are found in regions low in power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity and collectivism, whereas such associations are weaker in regions that score high on those Hofstede dimensions. I propose norm setting as the theoretical mechanism through which threatening contexts develop and mobilize especially those least prone-to-prejudice to express more negative attitudes towards outgroups.

 

If you are interested to attend to the meeting, please send an e-mail entitled “CESCUP SEMINAR APRIL 21” to the following address: kenzo.nera@ulb.ac.be . You will receive an invitation by e-mail.

MORE DETAIL

Email

kenzo.nera@ulb.ac.be

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CONTACT

Université Libre de Bruxelles
50 Avenue Franklin Roosevelt CP122
B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
Secrétaire: Luce Vercammen
Phone: +32 (2) 650 4643 Fax: +32 (2) 650 4045